You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/cd1?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[GABRIEL FUSTER v. E. F. JOHNSON](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/cd1?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:cd1}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 1188, Jan 31, 1903 ]

GABRIEL FUSTER v. E. F. JOHNSON +

DECISION

1 Phil. 670

[ G.R. No. 1188, January 31, 1903 ]

GABRIEL FUSTER, PETITIONER, VS. E. F. JOHNSON, JUDGE OF FIRST INSTANCE OF MANILA, RESPONDENT.

D E C I S I O N

ARELLANO, C.J.:

The plaintiff has appealed against an order overruling a demurrer in a criminal case and asks that an injunction be issued restraining the judge below from continuing the proceedings until this court passes upon the action of mandamus brought against him. The order in question not being appealable under section 24 of the General Orders, No. 58, series of 1900, there is nothing which can prevent the continuation of the case.

The application for an injunction is therefore denied, with costs.

Torres, Cooper, Willard, Mapa, and Ladd, JJ., concur.


tags