You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/cc3f?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[JUAN RETES v. DAMASO SUELTO](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/cc3f?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:cc3f}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show as cited by other cases (1 times)
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 6591, Oct 24, 1911 ]

JUAN RETES v. DAMASO SUELTO +

DECISION

20 Phil. 394

[ G. R. No. 6591, October 24, 1911 ]

JUAN RETES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. DAMASO SUELTO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

JOHNSON, J.:

On the 29th of January, 1909, the plaintiff  filed a  complaint against the defendant for the purpose of recovering the possession of five parcels of land, which were particularly described in paragraph two of the complaint, together with  damages for the unlawful detention of the same.

The facts alleged in the first three paragraphs of the complaint, which were admitted to be true by the defendant, are as follows: 

"First. That the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of the barrio of Tampe, municipality of Ayuquitan, of the Province of Oriental Negros. 

"Second. That  upon the 16th of March, 1904, the plaintiff received of the defendant as  a  loan  the sum of P408, to guarantee the payment  of which sum he mortgaged the following described parcels of land: 

"(a)  In the sitio of Tandayat,  municipality of Ayuquitan, with an area of eight gantas of shelled corn, planted in coco palms, bounded on the north by land of Crisanto Retes, Matias Rada, and Laurencio Salatandor, on the south by land of Gabina Salatandor, and on the west by that of Cipriano Cines. 

"(b)  In the sitio of Tandayat,  municipality of Ayuquitan, with an area of two  gantas of shelled corn, planted in coco palms, bounded on the north by land of Rufino Cines, on the east by the seashore, on the south by land of Higino Catipay, and on the west by the highway. 

"(c)  In the sitio of Tandayat,  municipality of Ayuquitan, with an area of twenty gantas of shelled corn, planted in coco palms, bounded on the north by land of Antonio Cid, on the east by  the highway, on the south and west by a mangrove swamp. 

"(d)  In the sitio of Tampe, municipality of Ayuquitan, with an area of half a cavan of shelled corn, planted in coco palms, bounded on the north by land of Cipriana Belocora, on the east by the seashore, on the south by land of the deceased Marcelino Estorado,  and on the west by land of Sinforosa Silay. 

"(e)  In the sitio of Tampe,  said municipality of Ayuquitan, with an area of one ganta  of shelled corn, with coco and buri palsas, bounded on the north by land of Balbino Binondo, on the east by the highway, on the south by (land of)  Matea Retes, Venancio Bandoquillo, and  Damian Binondo, and on the west by (land of)  Geronimo de la Pena.
   
 "Third. That the debt and  the conditions of  the mortgage appear in a simple document, in which it  also appears that  the  defendant should gather all of the fruits of said parcels of land as long as the plaintiff failed to satisfy the said  debt, provided that the payment should not be made before  the expiration of one  year  nor after  four years, with the  condition that the plaintiff and defendant should pay in equal parts the taxes due upon the  said  land until the entire debt should be paid."

It appears from the evidence adduced  during the trial of the cause that the plaintiff on  the 24th of February, 1908, went to  the house of the  defendant for the  purpose  of paying to the  defendant the sum due on the  said alleged mortgage, amounting to P408, and that the defendant refused to receive the said sum and to return to  the plaintiff the lands in question, which had been given as a guaranty for the payment of said sum.
 
 It appears also from the record that on or about the 5th of March, 1908, the plaintiff cited the defendant  to appear before the justice of the peace  of the pueblo of Ayuquitan, for the purpose of making a judicial offer to pay the said indebtedness and to secure the return of the possession of the lands  in question.  The evidence shows that the plaintiff, in the presence of the justice of the peace  and others, offered  to pay  to the defendant,  in cash, the said sum of P408.   The defendant refuse to accept the said money, whereupon the justice of the peace directed the plaintiff to deposit the said sum  with Felipe Remollo, president of the said pueblo, to be held for the benefit of the defendant and to be  paid to him any time  he might  wish to receive it.
 
The record  also shows that  the defendant remained in possession of  said  land  described  in the complaint  and continued to gather the crops, from the date on which the plaintiff deposited the amount due on the indebtedness between himself arid the defendant, up to the time the action was commenced in the lower court.

The lower court found that the value of the crops gathered by the defendant after the plaintiff had offered to return the money, amounted to P500.   The money which the  plaintiff had deposited  by the  direction  of the justice of the peace in the hands of Felipe  Remollo, was still in the possession of the said Remollo at the time of the trial.
   
From  the  record it appears that the  plaintiff  had done all that he was required to  do for the purpose of securing the  return of the possession of the land  in question and was entitled to the possession of the  same from and aftert the date on which he made a legal offer to pay the amount of the indebtedness  due the defendant.   (Lafont vs. Pascasio, 5 Phil. Rep., 391.)  When a person having the right of repurchase under a contract of pacto de retro makes a bona fide offer to repurchase, in accordance with the agreement and tenders the necessary amount of money, he has done all the law requires  of him to preserve  his right and to entitle him to the possession of the property.   (Villegas vs. Capistrano, 9  Phil. Rep., 416;  Fructo vs. Fuentes, 15 Phil. Rep., 362.)
 
The lower court rendered a judgment  against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff  in  the  sum  of P500, this  being the value  of the crops  harvested by the defendant  from the lands  in  question after  the  plaintiff  had offered to repurchase the same, together with the return of the possession  of the land.
 
It appears that the said P408 was  still  in  the  hands of Felipe Remollo at the time  of the trial.  The defendant has a right to receive from Felipe Remollo the said P408.
 
We find nothing in the record  that justifies  a  modification  of the conclusions of the lower court.  Therefore the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed with costs.

Torres, Mapa, Carson, and Moreland, JJ., concur.


tags