You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c892?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[US v. LAOYAN DOLUNEN](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c892?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c892}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 5136, Sep 11, 1909 ]

US v. LAOYAN DOLUNEN +

DECISION

G.R. No. 5136

[ G.R. No. 5136, September 11, 1909 ]

THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. LAOYAN DOLUNEN (ALIAS QUIBATAY), DALOCDOC Y GUAY, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

MORELAND, J.:

ROBBERY WITH HOMICIDE. From the Court of First Instance of the Mountain District. Moir, J.

Defendants went to the victim's house and asked permission to cook rice, and when the latter came out, they attacked and killed him. They also took away a carabao and other property of the deceased.  The court below imposed the death penalty and an indemnity.  On appeal defendants invoked the benefit of article 11 of the Penal Code, which, however, is not applicable in such cases, following the established rule. Judgment affirmed.

Per Moreland, J.

For appellants: John W. Haussermann.
For appellee: Solicitor-General Harvey.

tags