You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c86e?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[US v. EMILIO ARANETA](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c86e?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c86e}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 4068, Mar 12, 1908 ]

US v. EMILIO ARANETA +

10 Phil. 751 Unrep (Reporters Office)

[ G.R. No. 4068, March 12, 1908 ]

UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. EMILIO ARANETA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

CARSON, J.:

ATTEMPTED RAPE. From the Court of First Instance of Iloilo.  Ho error prejudicial to the rights of the accused appearing in the records, the conclusions of the lower court held to be justified, and judgment affirmed.

Per Carson, J.


For appellant: Carlos Ledesma and Ramon Fernandez.
For appellee: Attorney-General Araneta.

D E C I S I O N

The evidence of record sustains the findings and the judgment of conviction of the trial court, and we find no error in the proceeding prejudicial to the rights of the accused.

The judgment and sentence are therefore affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the appellant.

tags