You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c821?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[US v. SANG PING HONG](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c821?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c821}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 4981, Aug 18, 1909 ]

US v. SANG PING HONG +

DECISION

G.R. No. 4981

[ G.R. No. 4981, August 18, 1909 ]

THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. SANG PING HONG, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

CARSON, J.:

OPIUM LAW. From the Court of First Instance of Manila.
Smith, J.

Defendant was convicted of violation of The Opium Law, and sentenced to imprisonment for thirty  days and to pay a fine of P65, with subsidiary imprisonment.  The only question raised was respect to the sufficiency of the evidence. Proofs held sufficient. Judgment affirmed.

Per Carson, J.

For appellant: O'Brien & De Witt.
For appellee: Solicitor-General Harvey.

tags