You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c7cd?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[TEODORO SINICO v. CRISPINO REYES](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c7cd?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c7cd}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 4889, Dec 24, 1909 ]

TEODORO SINICO v. CRISPINO REYES +

DECISION

G. R. No. 4889

[ G. R. No. 4889, December 24, 1909 ]

TEODORO SINICO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. CRISPINO REYES, DEFENDANT AND APPELANT.

D E C I S I O N

Plaintiff contracted to reapir sugar machinery belonging to the defendant, for a certain amount, including labor and materials.  He sought to recover the alleged unpaid balance of P802.50.  Defendant contended that the whole amount had already been paid, and set up a counterclaim for damages on the ground that the repairs were not finished within the time agreed upon.  Judgment for plaintiff.  The evidence shows that the amounts due from defendants were P150, on account of the repairs, and P169.50 for other goods purchased by him from the plaintiff, and the judgment is so modified.

Per Mapa, J.

tags