You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c7c7?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[PEDRO A. ENRIQUEZ v. J.S. POWELL](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c7c7?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c7c7}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 5768, Dec 20, 1909 ]

PEDRO A. ENRIQUEZ v. J.S. POWELL +

DECISION

G.R. No. 5768

[ G.R. No. 5768, December 20, 1909 ]

PEDRO A. ENRIQUEZ, PETITIONER, VS. J.S. POWELL, JUDGE OF FIRST INSTANCE FOR THE SEVENT JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AND EMILIO CAMPOMANES, RESPONDENTS.

D E C I S I O N

Petitioner applied for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent judge to take cognizance of a protest against the election of a municipal president.  The judge refused to proceed with the protest because  it had been filed with the clerk of the court while the judge was holding sessions in another province from which he returned after he expiration of the two weeks fixed by the Election Law for the presentation of protests, and upon the ground that the law does not confer power upon the clerk  to receive and file such protests.  It is held, however, that the protest was presented in accordance with section 27 of Act No. 1582, and that it was the respondent's duty to take cognizance thereof.  Writ granted.

Per Johnson, J.

tags