You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c6af?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[US v. SIDNEY LEE BAYLEES](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c6af?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c6af}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 4642, Aug 28, 1908 ]

US v. SIDNEY LEE BAYLEES +

DECISION

11 Phil. 172

[ G.R. No. 4642, August 28, 1908 ]

THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. SIDNEY LEE BAYLEES, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

ARELLANO, C.J.:

On the 22d of December, 1907, the accused was in the saloon of Isabelo  Reyes in  Maytubig, municipality of Pasay. Nemesio Ilaya, a corporal of police, and two  other policemen, Julio  Salvador and Eugenio Wenceslao, went to the saloon in order to arrest the defendant  Sidney Lee Baylees under a warrant issued by the  justice of the peace of the said town.  The order, of arrest was issued on account of another charge made against the said accused also for attempt against the agents of the authorities, committed on the  night of the 5th of the said month  of December. The  policemen were in uniform, carried  their clubs and revolvers, and Corporal Nemesio Ilaya carried with him the warrant for arrest which he served on the accused, telling him to follow them.  This the accused refused to do, notwithstanding the fact that he understood  what the corporal told him in Tagalog; he made the excuse that he wanted a Spanish interpreter to interpret  the  order of arrest to him.  Afterwards he invited the corporal Nemesio Ilaya, to leave  the saloon,  and  the man had  hardly gone outside when he fired his revolver at him; the bullet went through the frame of the door where  Nemesio was standing, and the accused  then ran away after firing the shot.

The conclusions in the judgment are that the facts set forth were satisfactorily established by the evidence.  As a matter of fact the testimony of Nemesio Ilaya, supported by Julio Salvador and Isabelo Reyes,  fully prove the charge.

The accused knew that the parties who served the warrant were policemen; he admits that he understood what they said to him in Tagalog, and that they wanted him to go with them; he knew perfectly well that they came to arrest him on account of the attack of the 5th of December made upon three policemen, and which  he attributes to two members of the Constabulary who were with him on that evening and who, having  encountered the said policemen, fired  their revolvers  in the air, whereupon  the policemen fled.

The crime was properly qualified by the court below as a criminal attempt against the agents of the authorities punished by article 249, No, 2, in connection with article 250, No. 1, of the Penal Code, without considering any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.  The  accused, Sidney  Lee Bay lees, was  sentenced to four years  two months and one day of prision correccional and to pay a fine of 1,000 pesetas and costs, and, in case of insolvency in the payment of the fine, to subsidiary imprisonment at the rate of 12 ½ pesetas per diem.

The judgment being in accordance with the law and the weight of the evidence, the same is hereby affirmed in all its parts; provided, further, that the accused shall be sentenced to suffer the accessory penalties of the main penalty, and pay the costs of this instance.  So ordered.

Torres, Mapa, Carson, Willard, and Tracey, JJ., concur.

tags