You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c4eba?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[HERMENEGILDO U. ABSALUD v. EUSEBIO F. RAMOS](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c4eba?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c4eba}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ ADM Case No. 57, Oct 30, 1962 ]

HERMENEGILDO U. ABSALUD v. EUSEBIO F. RAMOS +

DECISION

ADM. Case No. 57

[ ADM. Case No. 57, October 30, 1962 ]

HERMENEGILDO U. ABSALUD, COMPLAINANT VS. HON. EUSEBIO F. RAMOS, JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF OCCIDENTAL MINDORO, RESPONDENT.

D E C I S I O N

SUMMARY

Complainant charged respondent for: (1) Malversation thru falsification of public document and (2) serious misconduct and inefficiency in office. On the first charge, the respondent satisfactorily explained his side and on the second charge, there was no substantial evidence to support it.  Hence, the investigating Justice recommended his exoneration. The Supreme Court concurred with the recommendation.

RULING

Complainant has  not made a good case against respondent.

tags