You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c46c8?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JOAQUIN v. NICANOR SIVA](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c46c8?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c46c8}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. L-19870, Mar 18, 1967 ]

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JOAQUIN v. NICANOR SIVA +

DECISION

125 Phil. 1004

[ G.R. No. L-19870, March 18, 1967 ]

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JOAQUIN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, VS. NICANOR SIVA, BASILIO SAPITANAN, ET AL, RESPONDENTS-APPLLEES.

D E C I S I O N

CONCEPCION, C.J.:

Petitioner, Municipality of San Joaquin, seeks the reversal of a decision of the Court of First Instance of Ilo­ilo dismissing the former's petition for prohibition, contest­ing the legality of Executive Order No. 436 of the President of the Philippines, dated July 10, 1961, creating the muni­cipality of Lawigan out of twenty-one (21) barrios theretofore forming part of said municipality of San Joaquin.  Respondents-appellees are the persons appointed by the President as mayor, vice-mayor and councilors of Lawigan, who are sought to be re­strained from performing their functions as such, upon the ground that Section 68 of the Revised Administrative Code, on which said Executive Order is based, constitutes an undue de­legation of legislative powers, and, hence, unconstitutional.  The lower court, however, held otherwise.  Hence, this appeal.

The issue herein has been squarely taken up and set­tled in Pelaez vs. Auditor General, G. R. No. L-23825, promul­gated on December 24, 1965, which upheld the theory of appel­lant herein, and rejected the view taken in the appealed deci­sion.

WHEREFORE, said decision is hereby reversed, and an­other one shall be entered declaring the aforementioned Executive Order No. 436 null and void ab initio, and directing here­in respondents-appellees to refrain from acting as officers of the municipality of Lawigan, with costs against them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Reyes, Dizon, Regala, Makalintal, Bengzon, Zaldivar, Sanchez, and Castro, JJ., concur.

tags