[ G.R. No. L-2743, March 29, 1950 ]
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. SIXTO CANDELARIA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
MORAN, C.J.:
Upon the basis of these facts, the appellant invoked the benefits of the Amnesty Proclamation. But the trial court refused to entertain such plea upon the belief that it can be invoked only before a Guerrilla Amnesty Commission but not in a Court of Justice. This is an error. It is expressly provided in the Amnesty Proclamation No. 8, that
"* * * the accused, during such trial, may present evidence to prove that his case falls within the terms of this amnesty. If that fact is legally proved, the trial judge shall so declare and this amnesty shall be immediately effective as to the accused, who shall forthwith be released or discharged."
The judgment appealed from is reversed, and the case remanded to the court below for new trial for such additional evidence as the parties may desire to introduce in connection with the benefits of Amnesty invoked by the accused-appellant. After trial, the court shall render a new judgment. Without costs.
Ozaeta, Pablo, Bengzon, Padilla, Tuason, Montemayor, and Reyes, JJ., concur.