You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c311?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[CHIYE MAGATINGE v. LA ELECTRICISTA](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c311?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c311}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights
2 Phil. 182

[ G.R. No. 1128, April 29, 1903 ]

CHIYE MAGATINGE, PETITIONER, VS. LA ELECTRICISTA, RESPONDENT.

D E C I S I O N

LADD, J.:

The defendant demurred to the complaint, and while the demurrer was still pending filed an answer. These two pleadings can not stand together. The effect of the filing of the answer was to supersede the demurrer. The motion to strike out the demurrer should be granted. So ordered.

Arellano, C. J,, Torres, Cooper, Willard, and Mapa, JJ., concur.

McDonough, J., did not sit in this case.


tags