You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP
Digest Add to Casebook
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2bf9?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[CECILIA V. MENDOZA v. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2bf9?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2bf9}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show as cited by other cases (1 times)
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. L-1044, Apr 26, 1947 ]

CECILIA V. MENDOZA v. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS +

DECISION

G.R. No. L-1044

[ G.R. No. L-1044, April 26, 1947 ]

CECILIA V. MENDOZA, ON BEHALF OF HER BROTHER-IN-LAW, PRISONER SOSTENES MENDOZA, PETITIONER, VS. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, RESPONDENT.

D E C I S I O N

CRIMINAL LAW; PARDON; UNDERSTANDING HAD WITH IMPERIAL JAPANESE FORCES AS TO PARDON, NOT PROVEN. The allegation that there was an understanding with the Imperial Forces that the convict would be granted pardon after six months work in the military installation in Davao was not proven. A computation of his service of the penalty shows that it has not yet expired. So, petition for habeas corpus is denied.
tags