You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2527?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[PEOPLE v. DE LA RAMA](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2527?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2527}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 44268, Jan 03, 1936 ]

PEOPLE v. DE LA RAMA +

DECISION

G. R. No. 44268

[ G. R. No. 44268, January 03, 1936 ]

PEOPLE VS. DE LA RAMA

D E C I S I O N

"Estafa", issuing of postdated check without sufficient funds. People vs. Quesada (G. R. No. 40846, 60 Phil., 515) and People vs. Lilius (G. R. No. 38774, 59 Phil., 339), not applicable; conviction sustained, judgment affirmed.


tags