You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP
Digest Add to Casebook
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2507?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[CONDE ET AL. v. OCAMPO](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2507?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2507}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 35663, Apr 05, 1932 ]

CONDE ET AL. v. OCAMPO +

DECISION

G.R. No. 35663

[ G.R. No. 35663, April 05, 1932 ]

CONDE ET AL. VS. OCAMPO AND ARTACHO-OCAMPO

D E C I S I O N

Vendor and purchaser; balance of purchase price; assumption of vendor's indebtedness by vendee. Judgment for plaintiffs modified.
tags