You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP
Digest Add to Casebook
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c24e9?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[GIMENEZ ET AL. v. MAXIMO ET AL.](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c24e9?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c24e9}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 35259, Apr 05, 1932 ]

GIMENEZ ET AL. v. MAXIMO ET AL. +

DECISION

G.R. No. 35259

[ G.R. No. 35259, April 05, 1932 ]

GIMENEZ ET AL. VS. MAXIMO ET AL.

D E C I S I O N

Evidence. Preponderance of; judgment for appellees affirmed.

tags