You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP
Digest Add to Casebook
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c24a9?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[PURIFICACION ET AL. v. LEDESMA ET AL.](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c24a9?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c24a9}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 35481, Apr 05, 1932 ]

PURIFICACION ET AL. v. LEDESMA ET AL. +

DECISION

G.R. No. 35481

[ G.R. No. 35481, April 05, 1932 ]

PURIFICACION ET AL. VS. LEDESMA ET AL.

D E C I S I O N

Real actions. Sufficiency of evidence; judgment for plaintiffs affirmed.

tags