You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c24a2?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[ENRIQUEZ v. JOCO DE CRUZ](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c24a2?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c24a2}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 35659, Apr 05, 1932 ]

ENRIQUEZ v. JOCO DE CRUZ +

DECISION

G.R. No. 35659

[ G.R. No. 35659, April 05, 1932 ]

ENRIQUEZ VS. JOCO DE CRUZ

D E C I S I O N

Sales; action to recover balance. Evidence insufficient; judgment for defendant affirmed.


tags