You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP
Digest Add to Casebook
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2441?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[PEOPLE v. MIRAFLOR](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2441?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2441}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 34789, Sep 03, 1931 ]

PEOPLE v. MIRAFLOR +

DECISION

G.R. No. 34789

[ G.R. No. 34789, September 03, 1931 ]

PEOPLE VS. MIRAFLOR

D E C I S I O N

Attempted rape; evidence, sufficient; nocturnity not present. Judgment affirmed.
tags