You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c231e?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[P. D. CARMAN v. DAVID E. ORDOÑEZ](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c231e?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c231e}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 40547, Aug 15, 1934 ]

P. D. CARMAN v. DAVID E. ORDOÑEZ +

DECISION

G. R. No. 40547

[ G. R. No. 40547, August 15, 1934 ]

P. D. CARMAN & CO., LTD., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. DAVID E. ORDOÑEZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Manila________, dated the _________27th__________ day of __________June_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs of this instance against the appellant.

It is further ordered that __________the appellee_________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.


tags