You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c22b0?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[LIDIA SARAFICA ET AL. v. AURELIO SERVANDO](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c22b0?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c22b0}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 39395, Jul 02, 1934 ]

LIDIA SARAFICA ET AL. v. AURELIO SERVANDO +

DECISION

G. R. No. 39395

[ G. R. No. 39395, July 02, 1934 ]

LIDIA SARAFICA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. AURELIO SERVANDO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________15th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Negros Occidental________, dated the __________9th__________ day of _________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed and the defendant is ordered to vacate Lot No. 863-A described in plaintiff's original petition and to restore the possession of same to the plaintiffs. Costs in this instance against the appellee.

It is further ordered that __________the appellants _________ from the __________the appellee_________ the sum of P__85.00__, as costs.

 


tags