You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2295?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[ROQUE SINCO v. ESTEBAN CABUSOG ET AL.](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2295?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2295}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 37875, Jul 14, 1934 ]

ROQUE SINCO v. ESTEBAN CABUSOG ET AL. +

DECISION

G. R. No. 37875

[ G. R. No. 37875, July 14, 1934 ]

ROQUE SINCO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ESTEBAN CABUSOG ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Negros Oriental________, dated the __________15th__________ day of _________February____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. No expression as to costs.

It is further ordered that the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.

 


tags