You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2267?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[ALEJANDRO BAUTISTA v. JOSE SAIZON](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2267?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2267}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 40343, Jun 06, 1934 ]

ALEJANDRO BAUTISTA v. JOSE SAIZON +

DECISION

G. R. No. 40343

[ G. R. No. 40343, June 06, 1934 ]

ALEJANDRO BAUTISTA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. JOSE SAIZON, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Rizal__________, dated the__________14th______________ day of __________July_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, without costs in view of the fact that this is a pauper's appeal.

It is further ordered that _________xxx__________xxx__________xxx__________ recover from __________xxs__________xxx the sum of P __xxx__, as costs.


tags