You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c21e6?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[JULIAN TAMAYO v. GRACIANO BARCENA](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c21e6?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c21e6}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 37636, Jun 09, 1934 ]

JULIAN TAMAYO v. GRACIANO BARCENA +

DECISION

G. R. No. 37636

[ G. R. No. 37636, June 09, 1934 ]

JULIAN TAMAYO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. GRACIANO BARCENA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Abra________, dated the __________16th__________ day of _________October____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost for this instance against the appellant.

It is further ordered that the __________the appellee_________from the _________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.


tags