You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c214b?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[EMILIA VICTORINO v. LUCIO MATAWARAN](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c214b?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c214b}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 39454, May 15, 1934 ]

EMILIA VICTORINO v. LUCIO MATAWARAN +

DECISION

G. R. No. 39454

[ G. R. No. 39454, May 15, 1934 ]

EMILIA VICTORINO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. LUCIO MATAWARAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-wo____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__80.00__, as costs.


tags