You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2126?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[TOMAS REYES v. ARISTON BRODIT](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2126?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2126}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 38872, May 03, 1934 ]

TOMAS REYES v. ARISTON BRODIT +

DECISION

G. R. No. 38872

[ G. R. No. 38872, May 03, 1934 ]

TOMAS REYES, ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ARISTON BRODIT, ET AL., DEFENDANT AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

The Court having regularly acquired jurisdiction of tho above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision, after consideration thereof by the court upon the record its decision and order for Judgment having been filed on the 13th day of April, nineteen hundred and thirty-four;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that sail ease be dismissed, without prejudice to the intestate estates of the deceased Joaquln Regalado alias Go Suana and Placida Francisco. In view of the fact that the interests of eact of the intestate estates appear to be opposed to each other, the interested parties should proceed in court in accordance with the procedure prescribed by Act No. 190, to secure the appointment of another administrator for the intestate estate of Placida Francisco; and as the income of the properties in question is considerable, it is only proper that in the meantime they be not placed In the hands of the administrator appointed by the court, that the appointment of a receiver be requested, who shall administer the same in accordance with law. Without special pronouncement as to costs.


tags