You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2044?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[ANTERO DE LOS SANTOS v. MACARIO RODRIGUEZ](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2044?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2044}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 35798, May 11, 1934 ]

ANTERO DE LOS SANTOS v. MACARIO RODRIGUEZ +

DECISION

G. R. No. 35798

[ G. R. No. 35798, May 11, 1934 ]

ANTERO DE LOS SANTOS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MACARIO RODRIGUEZ DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________APRIL________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________28th__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that _________the appellees___________ recovers from __________the appellant__________ of the sum of _________P40.00_________ as costs.


tags