You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2038?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[MAXIMO DOL-LOOG v. LAORPO TAGATAC](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2038?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2038}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 36407, May 07, 1934 ]

MAXIMO DOL-LOOG v. LAORPO TAGATAC +

DECISION

G. R. No. 36407

[ G. R. No. 36407, May 07, 1934 ]

MAXIMO DOL-LOOG, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. LAORPO TAGATAC, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Norte ________, dated the __________22nd__________ day of __________July____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that ____________the appellee____________ recover from the ____________the appellants_____________the sum P__40.00________, as costs.


tags