You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c1d9c?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[ESTELA DE STILIANOPULOS v. ESTELA DE RAMOS ET AL.](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c1d9c?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c1d9c}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 37695, May 16, 1934 ]

ESTELA DE STILIANOPULOS v. ESTELA DE RAMOS ET AL. +

DECISION

G. R. No. 37695

[ G. R. No. 37695, May 16, 1934 ]

ESTELA DE STILIANOPULOS, APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. ESTELA DE RAMOS ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND DEFENDANTS.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________21st__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirned with cost against the appellants.

It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________the sum of P__40.00___, as cost.


tags