You're currently signed in as:
User
Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c136f?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[BELGIAN CATHOLIC MISSIONARIES v. MAGALLANES PRESS](https://www.lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c136f?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c136f}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 25729, Nov 24, 1926 ]

BELGIAN CATHOLIC MISSIONARIES v. MAGALLANES PRESS +

DECISION

49 Phil. 647

[ G. R. No. 25729, November 24, 1926 ]

THE BELGIAN CATHOLIC MISSIONARIES, INC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MAGALLANES PRESS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS. JOSE MARIA MEMIJE, APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

VILLA-REAL, J.:

This is an  appeal taken by Jose Maria Memije from a judgment of  the  Court of First Instance of Manila  the dispositive part of which is as follows:

"For all the foregoing, the court is of the opinion that the plaintiff has a right to the relief prayed for in its complaint.  Wherefore,  judgment is rendered declaring that Exhibits C  and D,  that is, the mortgage deeds  in question in this  proceeding, in so far as they  prejudice  the rights of the  plaintiff, are null and void;  that the preliminary injunction issued in  this case against  the defendant Jose Ma. Memije is  final and  absolute; and that the plaintiff recover the amount of the fire insurance  policies of the defendant 'Magallanes Press,.Inc.,' which, or the representatives of which, is hereby ordered to  endorse said  insurance policies to  the plaintiff, with  the  costs of  the proceeding against the defendants, with  the exception of J. P. Heilbronn Co.,  Inc.  It is so ordered."

In support  of his appeal, the appellant  assigns the following supposed errors  as committed by  the lower court in its judgment, to wit:  (1) The court erred in overruling the demurrer filed by this  defendant to the  complaint in this action;  (2) the trial court erred in giving the plaintiff corporation  possession of the property mortgaged to this appellant without  following the necessary proceedings or complying with the  provisions of the law;  (3) the trial court erred  in issuing the  writ  of  preliminary injunction against the appellant and E. E.  Elser,  restraining the former from receiving from the latter,  or the latter from delivering to  the  former,  the amount  of the insurance policies covering the property mortgaged  to the appellant, which was damaged by  the fire  that occurred  in the  establishment of the Magallanes Press, Inc.;  (4)  the trial court erred in giving to the unnecessary intervention of the Magallanes Press, Inc., in the execution, of the  deed Exhibit C  an interpretation which is neither  based upon law nor upon the contract; (5) the trial court erred in ordering the suspension of the foreclosure of the appellant's mortgage on the property of the Magallanes Press, Inc.;  (6) the trial court erred, under  the facts proven in this case, in applying article  1297 of  the Civil Code;  (7)  the trial court  erred in finding in its decision that the defendant Jose Ma. Memije should not have executed the documents Exhibits C and D without taking into account the rights of the plaintiff  corporation,  The Belgian  Catholic Missionaries, Inc.; (8) the trial court erred in  declaring Exhibits C and D null and void in so far as they prejudice the rights of the plaintiff, over whose credit that of the  herein appellant is preferential; in declaring the writ of preliminary injunction issued against the defendant Jose Ma. Memije final and absolute; in giving judgment for the  plaintiff to recover the amount of the fire insurance policies of the defendant the Magallanes Press, Inc.; and (9) the trial court erred in  not making any pronouncement as to the counter-claim and  cross-complaint of the defendant Jose  Ma.  Memije in this action, nor taking the same  into consideration and rendering judgment thereon in favor of said defendant.

The oral  evidence has not  been forwarded to this court so that we are compelled  to  base our opinion  exclusively upon the documentary evidence and the facts  found  and stated by the trial court in its judgment.

It appears that on  December 1,  1921,  the Magallanes Press, through its manager H. Cameña, executed a promissory note in favor of J. P. Heilbronn & Co.,  Inc., for the sum of P3,472.92, with interest at 10 per cent per annum, payable  at  the rate of P250 a  month,  plus  the interest earned on  the unpaid  balance, until the whole  amount of the indebtedness shall have been paid, the first payment to be made on January 1, 1922, with the condition that upon the failure to pay any monthly installment or the interest earned  on the unpaid balance, the whole amount of the indebtedness shall become due, and the maker shall pay the payee an additional sum  equivalent to 15 per cent of the total balance, for attorney's fee and expenses of collection, forfeiting all right of exemption.

On the same date, December 1, 1921, the said Magallanes Press,  through  its  manager H. Camena, also executed  a promissory note in favor of J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc., for the sum of P0,715.77, with interest at 12  per cent per annum, payable  at the rate of P500 a month, together with the interest earned on the unpaid balance,  until the whole amount of the indebtedness shall have been paid, the first payment to be made  on  January 1, 1922, with  the condition that upon the failure to pay any monthly installment or the interest  earned on the  unpaid balance,  the  whole amount of the indebtedness shall become due, and the maker shall pay the payee an additional sum equal to 15 per cent of the total  balance  for  attorney's  fee and  expenses of collection, forfeiting all right of exemption.

To secure the payment of said promissory notes which amounted to  a total of P14,188.69,  H. Cameña, as general manager of the Magallanes Press, executed a chattel mortgage on all the printing machinery and its accessories, belonging to the said Magallanes Press, in  favor of J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc.

On  June 19, 1922,  the  Magallanes Press Co., Inc., successor to the Magallanes Press, with  all  the latter's rights and obligations,  through its  duly authorized president, E. F. Clemente, executed a chattel mortgage  on the same printing machinery and  its accessories in  favor of the Belgian Catholic Missionaries Co., Inc., which the Magallanes Press had mortgaged to J. P. Heilbronn & Co.,  Inc., to  secure the payment of a loan of  P30,500, with interest at 12 per cent per annum,  which the said  Magallanes Press & Co., Inc., had obtained from  the Belgian Catholic Missionaries Co., Inc., the duration of the mortgage loan being one year from the execution of the mortgage deed.

In December, 1922 the appellant Jose Ma. Memije made a loan in the sum of P2,000 to E. F. Clemente which was paid on account of the indebtedness of the Magallanes Press to J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc., together with the sum of P1,641 which A. F. Mendoza owed said E. F. Clemente.

On the occasion of the issuance of the writ of attachment in civil cause  No. 23818 of the Court of First Instance of Manila, entitled Jose Ma. Cavanna vs. The Magallanes Press Co., Inc., the defendant Jose Ma. Memije, on February 21, 1923, filed  an  intervention in said  case.

All the  promissory notes executed by  the Magallanes Press in favor of J. P. Heilbronn  & Co., Inc., having been overdue for non-payment of the installments, as well as the respective  chattel mortgage, the  said J. P. Heilbronn & Co.,  Inc., transferred  all its mortgage  credit against the Magallanes Press to Jose Ma. Memije in consideration of the sum of P8,280.90, the balance  of said mortgage credit.

On March 14,  1923,  Enrique Clemente, as manager of the Magallanes Press  Co., Inc., executed a deed in  favor of Jose Ma. Memije by virtue of which the chattel mortgage which  was given by the Magallanes Press in favor  of J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc., anĀ£ transferred by  the latter to Jose Ma. Memije, was made to cover  an additional loan of P5,895.79, which included the sum of P2,000 which said Jose Ma. Memije had  advanced said Enrique Clemente in December,  1922.

On April 21, 1923, a fire occurred in the building where the printing machinery,  its accessories and other personal property of the Magallanes  Press Co.,  Inc., were located and which  were covered by said chattel mortgages.   Said property was  insured, and the insurance policies covering it were endorsed  to J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc., upon the execution  of the chattel mortgage thereon in favor of the latter.  When J. P. Heilbronn  & Co., Inc., transferred its mortgage  credit to Jose Ma. Memije it, in turn, endorsed said insurance policies to him.  The insurance companies were disposed to pay the respective insurance policies, which amounted to P7,686.45, but due to the issuance of  the  above-mentioned writ  of  preliminary  injunction, payment could not be made.

Due to the filing  of the  complaint in the present case on May 9, 1923,  and the issuance of the writ of preliminary injunction on May 10th of the same year, Jose Ma. Memije was unable to collect the amount of the insurance policies, and when he was summoned under the complaint on May 14,1923, he made demand on the Magallanes Press Co., Inc., for the payment of his mortgage  credit and on the same date the manager of said corporation, E. F. Clemente, permitted the secretary  of the  said corporation to place the property covered by  the mortgage into  the hands  of the said Jose Ma. Memije in order that the same might be sold, but the sale could not be consummated due to the issuance of the said writ of preliminary injunction.

The first question raised by the defendant and appellant has  reference to the  overruling of the demurrer filed by him to the complaint.

One of the grounds of said demurrer was that the complaint in this case did not allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the said defendant, in that, notwithstanding the fact that the said complaint was instituted to annul the document of transfer of the mortgage credit Exhibit C, it was not alleged in the said complaint that the defendant Jose Ma. Memije had any intention to defraud  the interests  of the plaintiff corporation,  which was absolutely impossible due to the nature of the transaction and the preferential character of the mortgage credit of J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc.

As to this paragraph of the complaint, the plaintiff company having known of the existence of a chattel mortgage in favor of J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc., the latter, either as the first or as the second mortgagee, had a  perfect right to transfer its mortgage credit, without the knowledge  or consent of any other mortgagee, inasmuch as whoever acquired it, would have exactly the same status as the transferor with the same rights and  obligations. The fact, therefore,  that  the  MagaUanes Press Co., Inc., had  consented to the transfer of the mortgage credit of J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc., to Jose Ma. Memije, does  not constitute a fraud that can vitiate  the said transfer, inasmuch as the order of preference of the existing  mortgages has not been altered, and its allegation does not constitute a cause of action to annul the said transfer.

In regard to  the allegation contained in the ninth  paragraph of the complaint, it is very clear  that  the increase made by Jose Ma. Memije in the mortgage credit acquired by him from J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc., and the extension made by the Magallanes Press, Inc., of the mortgage to said additional  credit without the  knowledge or consent  of the plaintiff  company, as second mortgagee, prejudices the credit of the latter, inasmuch as the security for the payment of said  credit was reduced as to it, and, therefore, constitutes a fraud that vitiates the contract of extension of the mortgage evidenced by the deed Exhibit D, rendering it void.

The facts alleged  in paragraph  9  of the complaint are sufficient to constitute a  cause of action of nullity, and the lower court did not err in overruling the demurrer filed by the defendant Jose Ma. Memije.

In regard to the second assignment of  error, it appears that the  defendant Jose  Ma. Memije having attempted  to foreclose the mortgage, by which the mortgage credit acquired by him from J. P.  Heilbronn & Co., Inc., was secured, in order to recover  not  only the original credit but also the increase, the Belgian  Catholic  Missionaries Co., Inc., filed a complaint, with a  petition for a writ of preliminary injunction  against the sheriff, in  whose hands the foreclosure of the mortgage was placed.  The writ of preliminary injunction having been issued, upon the filing of a bond in the sum of P15,000, and there being no person more interested in the conservation and custody of the property covered by the mortgage than said plaintiff company, being the largest creditor, it applied and obtained from the  court the possession of the same.

Contrary to the contention of the appellant,  this case is not one of replevin but simply a proceeding instituted by the plaintiff  for the deposit  of the property in-litigation, upon the filing of a bond, said plaintiff acting as a receiver by authority  of the court, being the person most interested in the conservation and care of the same (sec. 174, Act No. 190; 11 C. J., 726).

The  lower  court, therefore, did not err in authorizing the plaintiff company to take possession of the personal property in litigation upon the filing of a bond sufficient to secure the conservation or value thereof.

The  third assignment of error raises the question  as to the preference of right between the plaintiff company and the defendant over the mortgaged property and the amount of the insurance policies covering a part thereof which was destroyed by fire.

As we have seen in the statement of the pertinent  facts necessary for the clear and accurate solution of the  questions of law  involved in the present appeal, the firm  of J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc., had a mortgage credit against the Magallanes Press for the sum of P14,186.69, secured by a first chattel mortgage.   The plaintiff company,  the Belgian Catholic Missionaries Co., Inc., also had a mortgage credit for the amount  of P30,500,  secured by a  second mortgage on the same personal property.  After this second mortgage had been executed, the payment of the mortgage credit of J. P. Heilbronn  & Co., Inc., became due, which credit had been reduced to the sum of P8,280.90 through partial payments, and the herein defendant-appellant Jose Ma,  Memije acquired  said mortgage credit  and  increased it by P5,895.59,  of which increase P2,000 was a previous loan.

There is  no question but that J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc., at the time of the transfer of its mortgage rights to Jose Ma. Memije, had a preferential right over that of the  Belgian Catholic Missionaries Co., Inc., for the remainder of the amount of the mortgage credit, that is, P8,280.90.   The plaintiff company had a preferential right to  the rest of the value of the mortgaged property after deducting the remaining mortgage credit of J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc.

The  increase of P5,895.59 made by the defendant Jose Ma. Memije in  favor of the Magallanes Press Co., Inc., and the extension of the mortgage thereto, are not only subordinate  to the mortgage credit  of  the plaintiff company, being subsequent in time and in registration, but said increase  in the  security  is also void.  The  increase of the mortgage  security becomes  a  new  mortgage in  itself, inasmuch  as the original mortgage did not contain  any stipulation  in regard to the increase of the mortgage credit, and even  if it did, said increase would take effect only from the date of the increase.  A mortgage that contains a stipulation  in regard to future advances in the credit will take effect  only from the date the same are made and not from the date of the mortgage (11 C. J., 448; 5 R. C. L., 420-421).  In  accordance with the provisions of section 5 of Act  No.  1508,  known as the Chattle Mortgage Law, the parties to the original  deed swore that the  same was mortgaged "to  secure the obligations specified  therein and for no other purpose."  Neither the increase in question, nor the extension  of the mortgage to secure the payment of the same, is specified in the deed, consequently said extension is void.  "Where the statute provides  that the parties to a chattel mortgage must make oath that the debt is a just debt, honestly due  and owing from the mortgagor to the mortgagee, it is obvious  that a valid  mortgage cannot be made to secure a debt to be thereafter contracted."   (11 C. J., 448.)

Briefly, therefore, we have the following:

(a)  That Jose Ma. Memije has a preferential right to the value of the chattels mortgaged  and the amount of the insurance policies up to the sum of P8,280.90;

(b)  That the plaintiff  corporation, the Belgian Catholic Missionaries Co., Inc., has a right to the remainder of the value of said chattels and the insurance policies up to the amount of P30,500, after deducting the preferential credit of Jose Ma.  Memije;

(c)  That as to the increase of P5,895.59, the right of the  defendant  Jose Ma.  Memije  is that  of  an  ordinary creditor.

In regard to the damages claimed by the defendant in his counterclaim and which is  the  subject-matter  of  his remaining assignments of error, said defendant has a right to interest at 12 per cent on the P8,280.90, the amount of the mortgage credit acquired by him from J. P. Heilbronn & Co., Inc., from February 26, 1923, the date of the acquisition until fully paid.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment appealed from is revoked and it is ordered that another be  entered  declaring  all  the  mortgages  overdue,  and  the mortgage credit of  Jose  Ma. Memije preferential over that  of  the Belgian Catholic Missionaries Co., Inc., up to  the amount of P8,280.90, with interest at the rate  of 12 per  cent per annum from February 26, 1923, until fully paid; the mortgage credit of the Belgian Catholic  Missionaries Co., Inc., for the sum of P30,500  with  interest at the rate  of 12 per cent per annum, from June 19,  1922, until fully paid, plus the sum of P3,000 for attorney's  fees, over the additional credit  of Jose  Ma.  Memije for P5,895.59; and  ordering the foreclosure  of the said  mortgages  by selling the  mortgaged  property at public auction,  to the proceeds of which  shall  be  added the amount  of  the insurance policies and the  above-mentioned credits in  the order of preference above established, without  special  pronouncement  as to costs.  So ordered.

Avanceña, C.  J.,  Johnson,  Street, Ostrand,  and Johns, JJ., concur.

tags