[ G.R. No. 12607, September 27, 1917 ]
THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. RUPINO PARRO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
MALCOLM, J.:
These facts constitute murder by inducement for a price and make the defendant guilty as principal in the commission of the crime. (Art. 13, No. 2, Penal Code, and U. S. vs. Gamao [1912], 23 Phil., 81 in connection with art. 403, No. 2, Penal Code and U. S. vs. Indanan ([1913], 24 Phil., 203. See also as corroborative authority U. S. vs. Valdez [1915], 30 Phil., 293, affirmed by the United States Supreme Court) There also concur the aggravating circumstances of evident premeditation, relationship, and commission in the night time and in an uninhabited place (and possibly others), offset by no mitigating circumstance. The trial court sentenced the defendant and appellant to cadena perpetua, to indemnify the heirs of the deceased Silverio Parro and Paciencia Sendencia each in the amount of P500, and to pay the costs. Agreeable to the recommendation of the Attorney-General and following the mandatory precepts of the law, we are forced to eliminate from this judgment so much as provides for life imprisonment and in lieu thereof to sentence the defendant and appellant Rufino Parro to be hanged until dead in accordance with law, with the costs of this instance. So ordered.
Arellano, C. J., Carson, Araullo, and Street, JJ., concur.