This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2000-07-14 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| It is also error for petitioners to insist that the issues respecting the validity of the auction sale should have been raised with the MTC. Petitioners do not, as they cannot, deny that execution of the MTC judgment has been partially satisfied. Thus, the MTC can no longer act on private respondent's questions regarding the auction sale of its properties. As held in Spouses Malolos v. Dy[14] -- | |||||