Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	AC. No. 4680 2000-08-29	AQUILINO Q. PIMENTEL v. ATTYS. ANTONIO M. LLORENTE MENDOZA, J.
on the part of the members of the canvassing committees who prepared the SoVs. This is the same allegation made in Pimentel v. Commission on Elections.[21] In rejecting this allegation and ordering respondents prosecuted for violation of R.A. No. 6646, §27(b), this Court said: There is a limit, We believe, to what can be construed as an honest mistake or oversight due to fatigue, in the performance of official duty. The sheer magnitude of the error, not only in the total number of votes garnered by the aforementioned candidates as reflected in the
	GR No. 125586 2000-06-29	DR. TERESITA G. DOMALANTA v. COMELEC YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Be that as it may, petitioners' claims are a matter of defense and as pointed out by the Court recently in Pimentel, Jr. v. COMELEC [21] -