Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 153263 2008-08-28	EMMA VER-REYES v. CA NACHURA, J.
Citing our rulings that a notation of lis pendens does not create a right or a lien upon the subject property,[29] and that the applying party is not required to prove his right or interest over the property on which the notice is sought to be annotated,[30] petitioner argues that the annotation of the notice of lis pendens under the circumstances would only serve as a warning to third parties that the real property is subject to a pending litigation such that persons dealing with it would do so at their own risk, and it would not, in any way, prejudice the rights of Engracia's heirs who are named as owners of the subject real estate.
	GR No. 119088 2000-06-30	ZAIDA RUBY S. ALBERTO v. . CA YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
In Viewmaster Construction Corporation v. Reynaldo Y. Maulit and Edgardo Castro,[20] this Court did not confine the availability of lis pendens only to cases involving the title to or possession of real property when it held that:"According to Section 24, Rule 14 of the Rules of Court and Section 76 of Presidential Decree No. 1529, a notice of lis pendens is proper in the following cases, viz.: