You're currently signed in as:
User

UNGAY MALOBAGO MINES v. REPUBLIC

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2008-08-06
REYES, R.T., J.
Resolutions 1486, 1541, and 1554 have no effect on Executive Order 1088 whatsoever.[18]  (Emphasis supplied) Respondent UHPAP then filed a petition for certiorari[19] under Rule 65 with the CA, docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 87892.  It contended that the RTC committed grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction when it practically overturned the final and executory decision of this Court in G.R. No. 133763 by declaring in its September 25, 2003 Order that PPA Resolution Nos. 1486, 1541, and 1554 were valid and effective.[20]