This case has been cited 1 times or more.
2012-07-03 |
VILLARAMA, JR., J. |
||||
COA, for its part, opposes PEZA's contention that the last paragraph of Section 11 of R.A. No. 7916 authorizing the grant of per diems to ex officio members of the PEZA Board was not deleted by its amendatory law, R.A. No. 8748, citing this Court's ruling in Bitonio, Jr. v. Commission on Audit.[17] |