You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

INOCENCIO D. EBERO v. MAKATI CITY SHERIFFS RAUL T. CAMPOSANO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

AM No. P-07-2402
2008-10-15
ATTY. REDENTOR S. VIAJE v. ROLANDO A. DIZON
NACHURA, J.
The dismissal of the charges for grave misconduct and dishonesty is proper, because Viaje, despite notice, failed to attend the hearings scheduled by Judge Santos. In administrative cases, the complainant has the burden of proving by substantial evidence the allegations in the complaint.[6] And in the absence of contrary evidence, the presumption that respondent has regularly performed his duty prevails.[7]