This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-01-14 |
PEREZ, J. |
||||
| We do not agree. In the recent case of Trajano v. Uniwide Sales Warehouse Club,[5] this Court gave a brief discourse on judicial courtesy, which concept was first introduced in Eternal Gardens Memorial Park Corp. v. Court of Appeals,[6] to wit: x x x [t]he principle of judicial courtesy to justify the suspension of the proceedings before the lower court even without an injunctive writ or order from the higher court. In that case, we pronounced that "[d]ue respect for the Supreme Court and practical and ethical considerations should have prompted the appellate court to wait for the final determination of the petition [for certiorari] before taking cognizance of the case and trying to render moot exactly what was before this [C]ourt." We subsequently reiterated the concept of judicial courtesy in Joy Mart Consolidated Corp. v. Court of Appeals. | |||||