You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN v. JOSE T. CAPULONG

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR Nos. 217126-27
2015-11-10
CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES v. CA
PERLAS-BERNABE, J.
In Office of the Ombudsman v. Capulong[151] (March 12, 2014), wherein a preventive suspension order issued by the Office of the Ombudsman was - similar to this case - assailed through a Rule 65 petition for certiorari filed by the public officer before the CA, the Court held that "[t]here being a finding of grave abuse of discretion on the part of the Ombudsman, it was certainly imperative for the CA to grant incidental reliefs, as sanctioned by Section 1 of Rule 65."[152]