Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 193821 2015-11-23	PHIL-AIR CONDITIONING CENTER v. RCJ LINES BRION, J.
The question whether there was a breach of warranty is factual. Consequently, the Court should rely on the factual findings of the CA and RTC, which are generally deemed binding and conclusive to the Court. More so in a Rule 45 petition where only questions of law can be raised. Further, factual findings of the RTC, when affirmed by the CA, are conclusive on the Court when supported by the evidence on record.[67]
	GR No. 171897 2015-10-14	PHILIPPINE TRUST COMPANY v. FLORO ROXAS JARDELEZA, J.
Here, the fourth requisite is absent. A debt is liquidated when its existence and amount are determined.[37] Compensation can only take place between certain and liquidated debts; it cannot extend to unliquidated, disputed claims.[38] Since the loan obligation, including its amount and demandability, is still being disputed in CA-G.R. CVNo. 30340, PTC's credit cannot be considered liquidated as of yet. Consequently, no legal compensation could have taken place between PTC's loan credit and the Spouses Roxas' judgment credit.