This case has been cited 4 times or more.
|
2015-04-22 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Res judicata applies by way of, either (1) "bar by prior judgment" or (2) "conclusiveness of judgment."[28] For res judicata as a "bar by prior judgment" to apply, four (4) essential requisites must concur, to wit:(a) finality of the former judgment; | |||||
|
2015-02-11 |
PERLAS-BERNABE, J. |
||||
| Notably, res judicata has two (2) concepts. The first is "bar by prior judgment" in which the judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction on the merits concludes the litigation between the parties, as well as their privies, and constitutes a bar to a new action or suit involving the same cause of action before the same or other tribunal, while the second concept is "conclusiveness of judgment" in which any right, fact or matter in issue directly adjudicated or necessarily involved in the determination of an action before a competent court in which judgment is rendered on the merits is conclusively settled by the judgment therein and cannot again be litigated between the parties and their privies whether or not the claim, demand, purpose, or subject matter of the two actions is the same.[37] | |||||
|
2014-11-19 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| [27] G.R. No. 167484, September 9, 2013, 705 SCRA 222. | |||||
|
2014-09-17 |
PERLAS-BERNABE, J. |
||||
| Res judicata has two (2) concepts. The first is "bar by prior judgment" in which the judgment or decree of the court of competent jurisdiction on the merits concludes the litigation between the parties, as well as their privies, and constitutes a bar to a new action or suit involving the same cause of action before the same or other tribunal. The second is "conclusiveness of judgment" in which any right, fact or matter in issue directly adjudicated or necessarily involved in the determination of an action before a competent court in which judgment is rendered on the merits is conclusively settled by the judgment therein and cannot again be litigated between the parties and their privies whether or not the claim, demand, purpose, or subject matter of the two actions is the same.[36] | |||||