This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2014-01-22 |
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J. |
||||
| Jurisprudence also tells us that where there is no evidence that the witnesses of the prosecution were actuated by ill motive, it is presumed that they were not so actuated and their testimony is entitled to full faith and credit.[12] In the case at bar, no imputation of improper motive on the part of the prosecution witnesses was ever made by appellants. | |||||
|
2014-01-15 |
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J. |
||||
| It is settled in jurisprudence that, absent any showing that the lower court overlooked circumstances which would overturn the final outcome of the case, due respect must be made to its assessment and factual findings, moreover, such findings, when affirmed by the Court of Appeals, are generally binding and conclusive upon this Court.[11] After a thorough examination of the records of this case, we find no compelling reason to doubt the veracity of the findings and conclusions made by the trial court. | |||||