This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-03-25 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Finally, this case does not fall within any of the recognized exceptions[42] to the rule that only questions of law are proper in a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court. Settled is the rule that factual findings of labor officials, who are deemed to have acquired expertise in matters within their respective jurisdiction, are generally accorded not only respect but even finality, and bind us when supported by substantial evidence.[43] Certainly, it is not the Court's function to assess and evaluate the evidence all over again, particularly where the findings of both the CA and the NLRC coincide.[44] | |||||