This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2013-11-11 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| (3) The dishonor of the check by the drawee bank for insufficiency of funds or credit or the dishonor for the same reason had not the drawer, without any valid cause, ordered the drawee bank to stop payment.[20] | |||||
|
2013-07-24 |
PEREZ, J. |
||||
| The gravamen of the offense punished by Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 is the act of making and issuing a worthless check or a check that is dishonored upon its presentation for payment.[13] Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 punishes the mere act of issuing a worthless check. The law did not look either at the actual ownership of the check or of the account against which it was made, drawn, or issued, or at the intention of the drawee, maker or issuer.[14] The thrust of the law is to prohibit the making of worthless checks and putting them into circulation.[15] | |||||