Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 189262 2015-07-06	GBMLT MANPOWER SERVICES v. MA. VICTORIA H. MALINAO SERENO, C.J.
A plain reading of the provision reveals that it applies only to an illegally dismissed overseas contract worker or a worker dismissed from overseas employment without just, valid or authorized cause as defined by law or contract.[84] The monetary award provided in Section 10 of R.A. 8042 finds no application to cases in which the overseas Filipino worker was not illegally dismissed.
	GR No. 170029 2012-11-21	SAMEER OVERSEAS PLACEMENT AGENCY v. MARICEL N. BAJARO PERLAS-BERNABE, J.
Indisputably, respondents' illegal dismissal complaint with money claims is anchored on the overseas employment contracts with petitioners and the allegations that they were dismissed without just, valid or authorized cause. With these allegations, Section 10 afore-quoted clearly applies in this case.[19] As petitioners failed to establish a valid retrenchment, respondents were clearly dismissed without just, valid or authorized cause.