This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2012-07-11 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| In this case, we find that the RTC abbreviated the proceedings and precipitately granted the respondents' application for injunctive relief. The RTC did not conduct a hearing for reception of a "sampling" of the parties' respective evidence to give it an idea of the justification for its issuance pending the decision of the case on the merits.[35] It failed to make any factual finding to support the issuance of the writ of preliminary injunction since it did not conduct any hearing on the application for the issuance of the writ of preliminary injunction or TRO. The RTC conducted the March 22, 2000 and April 24, 2000 hearings on the respondents' omnibus motion only whether to admit the amended complaint and whether to hold a hearing on the respondents' application for a writ of preliminary injunction. | |||||