You're currently signed in as:
User

ANSELMO TAGHOY v. SPS. FELIXBERTO TIGOL

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2016-01-12
SERENO, C.J.
In a Resolution[15] dated 3 August 2011, the members of the Special Third Division referred the case to the Court En Banc. On 16 August 2011, the Court En Banc resolved to accept the case.[16] The Court then issued a Resolution[17] requiring petitioners, the BSP and the DAR, which was represented by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), to file their respective Comments on the Motion for Reconsideration.
2011-06-15
SERENO, J.
...the ends of justice will be better subserved if the Statutory Receiver is given the fullest opportunity to monetize the assets of the bank which are supposed to be outside of the coverage of the CARL or may be converted into non-agricultural uses. [44]