You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

EUGENIO 'JING-JING' FAELNAR v. PEOPLE

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR Nos. 154796-97
2003-10-23
RAYMUNDO A. BAUTISTA v. COMELEC
CARPIO, J.
The instant controversy involves resolutions issued by the COMELEC en banc which do not pertain to election offenses. Hence, a special civil action for certiorari is the proper remedy[15] in accordance with Section 2, Rule 64 of the Rules of Court which provides:SEC. 2. Mode of review. - A judgment or final order or resolution of the Commission on Elections and the Commission on Audit may be brought by the aggrieved party to the Supreme Court on certiorari under Rule 65 except as hereinafter provided. (Emphasis supplied)