This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2014-09-01 |
BERSAMIN, J. |
||||
| With regard to the allegation of gross ignorance of the law, the complainant alleged that as a judge, Judge Madrona was expected to know the pertinent law and procedural rules, and to apply them properly and in good faith; that his stubborn refusal to reconsider the default declaration despite having been fronted with jurisprudence, citing Diaz v. Diaz,[13] that the reglementary period within which to file an answer to a complaint should be counted from a party's receipt of the order denying a motion for reconsideration; and that MBDC should not have been declared in default without an earlier resolution of the motion for reconsideration.[14] | |||||