Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

NELSON JENOSA v. REV. FR. JOSE RENE C. DELARIARTE

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 169391 2012-10-10	SPS. EUGENE C. GO AND ANGELITA GO v. COLEGIO DE SAN JUAN DE LETRAN BRION, J.
The right to establish disciplinary rules is consistent with the mandate in the Constitution[38] for schools to teach discipline;[39] in fact, schools have the duty to develop discipline in students.[40] Corollarily, the Court has always recognized the right of schools to impose disciplinary sanctions on students who violate disciplinary rules.[41] The penalty for violations includes dismissal or exclusion from re-enrollment.
	GR No. 166858 2012-01-18	SOLEDAD TUCKER v. SPS. MANUEL P. OPPUS AND MARIA PAZ M. OPPUS PERALTA, J.
Petitioner Soledad Tucker tried to register the Deed of Absolute Sale dated January 13, 1988, but could not do so because of an annotation dated May 31, 1989 of the Affidavit of Loss of TCT No. N-120581 by the owners. Consequently, the Tuckers filed before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Pasig City[6] a suit for the cancellation of the said annotation. After the annotation was cancelled, Soledad Tucker caused the annotation of the Deed of Absolute Sale in her favor, and TCT No. 172138 was issued in her name.
	GR No. 166858 2012-01-18	SOLEDAD TUCKER v. SPS. MANUEL P. OPPUS AND MARIA PAZ M. OPPUS PERALTA, J.
Thereafter, petitioners filed before the RTC of Pasig City a suit for Reconveyance and/or Quieting of Title and/or Removal of Cloud on Title to Real Property and Damages[7] against the Spouses Liganor. The Spouses Liganor, in turn, filed an action[8] to annul TCT No. 172138 in the name of petitioner Soledad Tucker. These cases were consolidated and assigned to Branch 159. In the Decision[9] dated April 21, 1995, the RTC of Pasig City, Branch 159 declared the Deed of Absolute Sale executed by the Spouses Oppus in favor of the Spouses Tucker as null and void and ordered the reconveyance of the property to the Spouses Liganor. The RTC held that the real intention of Maria Paz Oppus was to borrow money from the Spouses Tucker, and not to transfer ownership of the property, and that the agreement had the badges of pactum commisorium, and was, therefore, null and void.